Javascript will enable the page to open and include navigation header
HQ 114166
February 2, 1998
BRO-3-05-RR:IT:EC 114166 CC
Carl D. Cammarata, Esq.

Law Offices of George R. Tuttle Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1160 San Francisco, CA 94111
RE: Right to Make Entry; 19 U.S.C.  1484; 19 U.S.C.  1641; Related companies
Dear Mr. Cammarata:

This is in response to your request of November 11, 1997, on behalf of your client, that we rule that an employee of a company, who holds a Customs broker license, may make entry for another related company.

You have presented the facts as follows:

Company B is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Company A. Company A is contemplating forming a new wholly-owned subsidiary, Company C. Company B currently imports goods and will retain its own importer identification number. The newly-formed company, Company C, also will import goods and will apply for its own importer identification number.
Company B has a full-time employee, who has a Customs broker license (hereinafter the employee), who files entries on behalf of his employer. The employee has four additional employees on his staff who assist him in preparing and filing entries for Company B. You represent the employee and his employer, Company B, in this matter.
Under the proposal, the employee and his staff of Company B will continue to make entry for the company and will remain as full-time employees and receive their total compensation and benefits from Company B. However, the employee and his staff will also file entries for the new company, Company C. They will receive a valid power of attorney from Company C prior to making entry for it.
Company B and Company C will enter into an agreement that the employee and his staff will continue to be employed by Company B and receive their total compensation from Company B. Separate files and records for each company will be maintained by the employee and his staff. The employee will be accountable to Company B for the work he does for that company, and he will be accountable to Company C for the work he does for that company. Accounting and billing procedures will be established by the employee, Company B, and Company C to bill Company B for services performed by the employee and his staff on behalf of Company C.


Whether employees of a company may make entry for a related company.


Section 484 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 U.S.C.  1484) provides that only parties qualified as the "importer of record" may make entry. 19 U.S.C.  1484(a)(2)(B) provides that parties qualified as an importer of record are the owner or purchaser of the merchandise, or when appropriately designated by the owner, purchaser or consignee of the merchandise, a person holding a valid license under section 1641 (a licensed customs broker).
Owner or purchaser is defined in Customs Directive 3530-02, dated November 6, 1984, entitled "Right to Make Entry" as the following:

... any party with a financial interest in a transaction, including, but not limited to, the actual owner of the goods, the actual purchaser of the goods, a buying or selling agent, a person or firm who imports on consignment, a person or firm who imports under loan or lease, a person or firm who imports for exhibition at a trade fair, a person or firm who imports goods for repair or alteration or further fabrication, etc. Any such owner or purchaser may make entry on his own behalf or may designate a licensed customhouse broker to make entry on his behalf and may be shown as the importer of record on the CF 7501. The terms "owner" or "purchaser" would not include a "nominal consignee" who effectively, possesses no other right, title, or interest in the goods except as he possessed under a bill of lading, air waybill, or other shipping document. As provided for in 19 U.S.C.  1484, Customs Directive 3530-02, and 19 CFR  111.3(a), an owner or purchaser may make entry on its own behalf, and, therefore, would not be required to have a Customs broker license. In the factual situation presented, the employee is making entry for Company B, which is tantamount to Company B making entry on its own behalf. Thus, even though the employee holds a Customs broker license, he is acting as an employee of Company B and not as its broker. Consequently, the employee would not need a Customs broker license to make entry for Company B.
We have previously ruled on the issue of whether an employee of one corporation may make entry for a related corporation. Specifically, in Headquarters Ruling (HQ) 223804, dated June 29, 1994, we ruled on whether an employee of a parent corporation is considered an owner or purchaser and may therefore make entry on behalf of its subsidiary. We found in that ruling that because a parent corporation and a subsidiary are in law separate and distinct entities, a parent corporation could not make entry for its subsidiary. We did find in that ruling that based on agency principles, a person who was employed by both a parent corporation and its subsidiary could file an entry on behalf of the subsidiary, provided that there was a power of attorney that stated that the employee was an employee of the subsidiary and had the authority to file entries on behalf of the subsidiary.
Although in the present factual situation the companies are sister companies (both are subsidiaries of the same corporation) rather than a parent-subsidiary, the principles of HQ 223804 are applicable. The companies are considered separate and distinct entities, and, therefore, an employee of one corporation could not make entry for the other corporation. HQ 223804 indicates that if an employee were a bona fide employee of both corporations, he could make entry for each company in his capacity as an employee of each corporation. In the present factual situation, the employee is not employed by both corporations, but is only employed by Corporation B, since that is the company that is paying his wages. (For a more detailed discussion of the definition of an employee and the considerations in determining who has the status of an employee, see 54 FR 13136, dated March 30, 1989.) Consequently, the employee is not considered an employee of Company C and could not make entry for that company.
Finally, you contend that the employee may make entry on behalf of both Company B and Company C because he holds a valid Customs broker license pursuant to 19 U.S.C.  1641. As stated above, the employee is receiving his total compensation from Company B and is acting as its employee when making entry for Company B. The employee is not acting as a Customs broker by receiving compensation for doing Customs business on behalf of various parties for compensation; instead, he is an employee of Company B. Thus, based on the evidence before us, the employee may not make entry for Company C as a Customs broker.


An employee of one company may not make entry for a related company.

Jerry Laderberg Chief Entry Procedures and Carriers Branch

Print this document