U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Securing America's Borders
CUSTOMS RULINGS ONLINE SEARCH SYSTEM (CROSS)
955931: Protest 4110-94-100001; Fasteners; Screws; Studs; Bolts; HQ 954094
Ruling Date: Feb 3, 1995
Print
Download


HQ 955931
February 3, 1995


CLA-2 CO:R:C:M 955931 DWS

CATEGORY: Classification

TARIFF NO.: 7318

District Director
U.S. Customs Service
55 Erieview Plaza
Plaza Nine Building, 6th Floor
Cleveland, OH 44114

RE: Protest 4110-94-100001; Fasteners; Screws; Studs; Bolts;
HQ 954094

Dear District Director:

The following is our decision regarding Protest 4110-94-100001 concerning your action in
classifying and assessing duty on various metal fasteners under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS).

The merchandise involved in this protest consists of screws, machine screws, studs, and self-tapping screws used in automobile production. The issue involved in this protest is whether the
fasteners are classifiable as entered under subheading 7318.15.20, HTSUS, as bolts, or under the
provisions in the HTSUS which specifically describe the fasteners, as the entries were liquidated.

In HQ 954094, dated August 24, 1993, we reviewed Protest 4110-93-100011 which involved
identical merchandise. In that ruling, we determined that the fasteners were not bolts, but were
classifiable under the HTSUS provisions which specifically describe the fasteners. Accordingly,
we instructed your office to deny the protest.

In Protest 4110-93-100011, we were not provided with any samples of the fasteners. Because
we issued HQ 954094 without having examined any samples, the protestant filed for further
review of the subject protest, ensuring that this office received samples of the fasteners.

We have thoroughly reviewed all of the arguments in the subject protest and examined the
provided samples, and have determined that the holding in HQ 954094 that the fasteners are not
bolts is correct. The arguments made by protestant in this protest were specifically answered in
HQ 954094. Also, the presence of the samples has only confirmed our position that the fasteners
are not bolts.

In addition, we note that subsequent to receipt of HQ 954094, protestant filed a summons
before the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT), contesting our holding that the subject
fasteners are not bolts. The case pending before the CIT is Subaru-Isuzu Automotive, Inc. v.
U.S. (Court No. 94-03-00150).

In pertinent part, section 177.7(b), Customs Regulations [19 CFR 177.7(b)], states that:

[p]ending litigation in the United States Court of
International Trade. No ruling letter will be issued with
respect to any issue which is pending before the United
States Court of International Trade, the United States Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, or any court of appeal
therefrom. . .

In view of the fact that the tariff classification of these fasteners is now pending before the
CIT, Customs finds that it would be improper to address the issue.

The protest should be DENIED in full. In accordance with Section 3A(11)(b) of
Customs Directive 099 3550-065, dated August 4, 1993, Subject: Revised Protest Directive,
this decision, together with the Customs Form 19, should be mailed by your office to the
protestant no later than 60 days from the date of this letter. Any reliquidation of the entry
in accordance with the decision must be accomplished prior to mailing of the decision.
Sixty days from the date of the decision the Office of Regulations and Rulings will take
steps to make the decision available to Customs personnel via the Customs Rulings Module
in ACS and the public via the Diskette Subscription Service, Freedom of Information Act,
and other public access channels.

Sincerely,


John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division